|
|
Post by luisvillegas on Nov 6, 2008 3:14:41 GMT
As far as I know, many women would like to be princesses either by heritage or by marriage. However, I am not sure what ALL women think. Help me find it out!
|
|
Hamlet
Member of the Court
Posts: 29
|
Post by Hamlet on Jan 19, 2009 19:36:39 GMT
Great question!
Perhaps a definition is required for non Royal to understand what they are joining.
How about the advancement of peace to start.
Peace
|
|
|
|
Post by luisvillegas on Jan 22, 2009 4:39:53 GMT
Hamlet,
I think I did not understand your comment. Specially, how it is related to the question at hand. Can you explain yourself a little bit more?
Best,
Luis R. Villegas H.
|
|
Hamlet
Member of the Court
Posts: 29
|
Post by Hamlet on Jan 23, 2009 20:48:07 GMT
The Royals know better than any what life was like without peace. Peace is a five letter word that requires an incredible amount of resource to sustain. An orderly society with, for some, a religious component encouraged people to live with choices, respect, dignity, and so on.
Peace encouraged trade rather than war. Peace changed metal from a killing material to things of kind thoughts.
One day you will make a ring from metal to join a union of two hearts yours and another. This is a peaceful use of metal and one that has a completely different purpose than killing ... a good use for metal.
Huge celebrations take place in the Royal family when two hearts are joined. Perhaps a celebration of all that have allowed such peaceful unions to take place.
Please share your thoughts on this too.
Peace,
E-T
|
|
|
|
Post by luisvillegas on Jan 28, 2009 3:17:15 GMT
Hamlet,
I am still wondering how my poll inspired your sweet thoughts about peace and love. But upon your request I will share with you my thoughts in a less poetic manner.
First, let us talk about peace. Peace for me is something that is not accomplished from one day to another. Peace, in my opinion, is something that is built through constant work, thoughtful systems, and collaboration. If you want to have peace within 5 years, you better start working today. If you wait until war arises to provide the peace mechanisms in a promptly fashion you will fail for sure.
Then, history has showed us that war arises as a result of a "reduction of space." People that live together have a lot more probabilities to enter war state than people that live far away. Of course, there are exceptions but the common thing is war as a result of "reductions of space". In deed, a "reduction of space" can happen between two individuals living far away. Just think about the size of our planet as compared to the size of the universe: We are not so separated. To solve this issue we need to understand the principle of life: Our planet Earth is placed at a distance from the Sun such that allows life / biodiversity to happen. This is the balance state. A smaller distance causes Earth to burn and a bigger distance causes Earth to freeze. The people are like Earth. They need to keep a healthy distance among each other. So, in order to keep peace we need to create healthy rules of distance among people.
Finally, let us talk about love. Yes, not all reductions of space are damaging. Some generate love and end with the "union of two hearts", as you stated. Remember the problem is not metal, but what you do with it. Love is an example of another balance state in which, regardless of the distance, two persons love each other in a healthy manner. However, you must not let that love become damaging. Even within the greatest love of all a harmful reduction of space can emerge and destroy the sweet feelings. Love, as peace, needs to be built in the long-term and enjoyed in the short-term.
Best,
Luis R. Villegas H.
Mexico.
|
|
|
|
Post by princessoftides13 on Apr 30, 2009 22:56:49 GMT
but of course, darling! i see no way around it, its a very blessed and sweet life. but not without its important responsibilities and duties. cheers  |
|
|
|
Post by luisvillegas on May 7, 2009 3:17:06 GMT
It is a pleasure to meet you, Prince Richard.
You may have already heard about the working policies of this message board. If you claim to be a prince, princess, or any other royal you may be banned. You better take the warning seriously. Your poll was closed, by the way. I do not like anarchy but I find this policy a little bit exaggerated. It is a paradox that in a Royal Forum pure royalty is banned. Any way, just be careful... This is not my business.
Thank you for your comments, any way. The world works different everywhere. I like supporting a theory that says that all cultures and civilizations come from an ancient-unique-old civilization. Some call it "Mu". It is interesting but challenging. So, today you will find very similar concepts, buildings, organization patterns, languages, etc., everywhere! Recognizing the differences is essential to align our behaviors with our local and global (and universal) objectives. Humanity issues... you know.
I did not include the male point-of-view in my poll. But I think that the female opinion will give a good understanding of the male opinion.
Best regards,
Luis R. Villegas H.
Mexico.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cinderella on May 7, 2009 3:40:04 GMT
Royal people are not banned from this board. Everyone is welcome here, but extensive discussion of royal heritage is not allowed because I don't want the board to become a gathering place for imposters. This has nothing to do with Prince Richard and is not a judgement on his claims; it's a long-standing policy. Please see the board rules: worldofroyalty.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=rules&action=display&thread=1 |
|
|
|
Post by luisvillegas on May 13, 2009 22:20:43 GMT
Cinderella,
I got your point.
Best regards,
Luis R. Villegas H.
Mexico.
|
|
