Post by observer on May 7, 2013 22:43:52 GMT
An appeals court in the Balearic Islands, by a 2-1 decision, has ruled that the preliminary charges against Princess Cristina of Spain in the financial corruption case involving her husband will be dropped.
Apparently the judges agreed with the prosecutors and Princess Cristina's defense team that there was insufficient evidence to bring the preliminary charges against her.
If the prosecutors agreed that there was insufficient evidence, why were the charges brought in the first place?
Apparently the judges agreed with the prosecutors and Princess Cristina's defense team that there was insufficient evidence to bring the preliminary charges against her.
If the prosecutors agreed that there was insufficient evidence, why were the charges brought in the first place?